Model the pricing structure, not a savings claim

Per-seat vs. consumption pricing — which costs less for your volume?

This calculator compares raw subscription cost under two pricing structures using your own inputs — it is a pricing-structure planning aid, not a savings estimator and not a Voz360 performance claim. Set your agent count, monthly interaction volume, and illustrative price assumptions to see how per-seat and consumption-based totals compare over your chosen time horizon.

This calculator compares raw subscription cost under two pricing structures using your own inputs — it is a pricing-structure planning aid, not a savings estimator and not a Voz360 performance claim. Set your agent count, monthly interaction volume, and illustrative price assumptions to see how per-seat and consumption-based totals compare over your chosen time horizon.

Pricing-structure planner

Compare per-seat vs. consumption cost under your own assumptions.

Set illustrative price assumptions and a time horizon to see how the two pricing structures compare under your volume. These are user-adjustable starting points, not Voz360’s published pricing — Voz360’s actual pricing is contact-for-pricing, illustrative-tier packaging. This is not a product performance claim; it does not predict a Voz360 result.

Per-seat total$0Agents × seat price × months
Consumption total$0Interactions × interaction price × months
Difference$0Illustrative comparison only
01

Per-seat pricing

Charges a fixed amount per licensed agent per period, independent of volume — predictable to forecast, but you pay for idle capacity during slow periods.

02

Consumption pricing

Charges by actual usage — avoids paying for idle seats, but a volume spike (planned or not) directly increases cost.

03

Most vendors blend both

Confirm what is seat-included vs. usage-metered — AI features in particular are frequently metered even under a per-seat base plan.

01Distinct

Cost structure, not efficiency savings

This tool compares raw subscription cost under two pricing models — it does not estimate hours or dollars saved from an efficiency assumption.

02Your numbers

Illustrative inputs, not published pricing

Default values are starting points you adjust. Voz360’s actual pricing is contact-for-pricing, illustrative-tier packaging — see Pricing.

03Ask next

Bring the unit economics to an RFP

Confirm what is seat-included vs. usage-metered with any vendor, since AI features are frequently metered separately even under a per-seat base plan.

Questions, answered

What enterprise buying teams want to know.

Self-contained answers, so the questions a security or procurement reviewer asks first don't require reading the whole page.

What does this calculator compare?

It compares total cost under per-seat pricing (agents × seat price × months) against total cost under consumption pricing (monthly interactions × per-interaction price × months), using your own assumptions.

Is this different from the ROI scenario planner?

Yes. The ROI planner estimates hours and dollars saved from an efficiency-improvement assumption. This calculator compares raw subscription cost under two pricing structures — a pricing-structure decision tool, not a savings estimator.

Are the default numbers Voz360’s real prices?

No. The default and example values are illustrative, user-adjustable starting points. Voz360’s published pricing page uses an illustrative, contact-for-pricing tier structure with exact figures pending business sign-off.

Why would consumption pricing cost more than per-seat at high volume?

Consumption pricing charges per interaction regardless of headcount, so at high volume relative to agent count, the per-interaction total can exceed a fixed per-seat total — model your own volume and price assumptions to see where that crossover happens for your operation.

Talk to Voz360

Run it on your terms.

Bring your deployment constraints, compliance requirements, and channel mix. We will show you exactly where control lives in the architecture.